Maroulakos D., Chotorlishvili L., Schulz D., and Berakdar J.
Symmetry 12, pp 1078 (2020)Since the foundational development of quantum mechanics, the measurement process and the wave function collapse have been under discussion [1?15]. One aspect is how to quantify and possibly modify the destructive effect of a certain measurement on a quantum state, an issue that is clearly of importance for quantum information transfer and processing. Here, we consider the ?quantum witness? as the measure invasiveness in a combined quantum system. Our system described by the density operator ?rAB consists of two parties A and B that interact with each other either directly A->B or indirectly through the third quantum system f, i.e., A->f->b. Let us consider two types of measurements: (i) We perform a measurement on f, and then on A, in contrast to measuring A directly. (ii) We conduct a measurement on A and then on B. For Case (i), A interacts with f directly. Measurements done on f have a direct influence on the outcome of measurements done on A; this case is referred to as the local quantum witness. In Case (ii), A and B are interrelated via f; a measurement performed on A affects B through the quantum channel f, a case called the non-local quantum witness. One may wonder about
Full text:PDF (536kB)
(For personal use only. Please send an email to our secretary if you need the paper.)